eccl[es]ie / requiescant in pace amen', 14th century (f. 5v).Inscribed 'Iohannes Waytt of Sudbere...', 15th century (f. 4v).The Old Royal Library (the English Royal Library): Westminster inventory number 'no. 1380' (f. 6), acquired by the Upper Library at Westminster after
eccl[es]ie / requiescant in pace amen', 14th century (f. 5v).Inscribed 'Iohannes Waytt of Sudbere...', 15th century (f. 4v).The Old Royal Library (the English Royal Library): Westminster inventory number 'no. 1380' (f. 6), acquired by the Upper Library at Westminster after
eccl[es]ie / requiescant in pace amen', 14th century (f. 5v).Inscribed 'Iohannes Waytt of Sudbere...', 15th century (f. 4v).The Old Royal Library (the English Royal Library): Westminster inventory number 'no. 1380' (f. 6), acquired by the Upper Library at Westminster after
d.1609), in the entry of the catalogue of St. Augustine's abbey (see St Augustine's Abbey 2008, p. 939)The Old Royal Library (the English Royal Library): Westminster inventory number 'no. 1116' (f. 1), included in the Upper Library at Westminster after
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
XI (art. 4), Harley 3199, Lansdowne 214 (imperfect), and Egerton 940.The manuscript seems to have been made for an unidentified English Knight of the Garter based in Rouen whose name once appeared in an inscription (now erased) at the end
name 'Iohannis Heesbeen' and referring to the city of Bosch (?s'Hertogenbosch) (f. 209). Humfrey Wanley (b. 1672, d. 1726), OldEnglish scholar, palaeographer, and librarian of Robert and Edward Harley, earls of Oxford: inscribed ‘Bought of H. W.' (f. [ii]).
name 'Iohannis Heesbeen' and referring to the city of Bosch (?s'Hertogenbosch) (f. 209). Humfrey Wanley (b. 1672, d. 1726), OldEnglish scholar, palaeographer, and librarian of Robert and Edward Harley, earls of Oxford: inscribed ‘Bought of H. W.' (f. [ii]).
name 'Iohannis Heesbeen' and referring to the city of Bosch (?s'Hertogenbosch) (f. 209). Humfrey Wanley (b. 1672, d. 1726), OldEnglish scholar, palaeographer, and librarian of Robert and Edward Harley, earls of Oxford: inscribed ‘Bought of H. W.' (f. [ii]).